LGBT Final Paper Draft

While the nature of specific issues relating to gay communities in America differ from the ones addressed by the gay liberation movement in the last four decades of the previous century, the gay rights movement has made significant progress since the 1980s, and continues to strive for sexual equality in American society today. The events that took place during the second half of the 20th century had a huge impact on homosexual communities across the country. Neil Miller, author of Out of the Past: Gay and Lesbian History, describes the time period between the 1960s and the 1980s as the era of “gay liberation” because an explosion of progressive action in the fight for gay rights took place during those twenty years. While Miller was correct in saying that the era of gay liberation began in the 1960s, before which homosexuality was almost universally disapproved of, the era of gay liberation did not end with the start of the “gay moment” in the 1980s, as he suggests. The gay rights movement has continued to make significant progress since the 1980s but many issues, such as those surrounding same sex marriage, have yet to be resolved because of contemporary America’s inflexibility with regard to altering established institutions and their preexisting norms.

Prior to the 1960s, the homosexual community in the US did not have an organized agenda for liberation. Their main concern was to keep a low profile in a homophobic society. During the 19th century, Oscar Wilde, one of London’s most popular playwrights, was imprisoned based on charges of gross indecency with men. One of his lovers, Lord Alfred Douglas, described homosexuality as “the love that dare not speak its name”, depicting it as form of expression that must remain hidden and secret from the others out of pure fear. Attitudes of fearful silence around homosexuality remained in vogue until the 20th century. Most homosexuals found it necessary to keep their sexual orientation secret from their employers lest risk their jobs. In 1953, President Eisenhower issued Executive Order 10450 stating, “sexual perversion was sufficient and necessary grounds for exclusion from federal employment”, and by 1960, the State Department had fired approximately 1,000 suspected homosexuals (Miller 238). Students also faced similar pressures regarding their sexual orientation. An individual called B.D.H. was expelled from the University of Illinois for making a pass at another student and was harassed by FBI agents afterwards to disclose the names of fellow peers who were also homosexual (Miller 239). This process mirrored the black listing process undertaken by the government during the anti-communist era of McCarthyism during the Cold War. For homosexuals living in America during this time period, it was in their best interest to keep their sexuality undisclosed to the public so as to avoid a disadvantaged lifestyle.

The Stonewall riots in New York marked the beginning of what Miller describes as the era of “gay liberation” because they brought about a paradigm shift in the way many regarded homosexuality and homosexuals. The events of Stonewall fostered a new kind of homosexual, “…the new homosexual of the Seventies, an unfettered, guiltless male child of the new morality in a Zapata mustache and an outlaw hat, who couldn’t care less for Establishment approval” (Miller 337). One of the most important distinctions between pre-Stonewall and post-Stonewall attitudes was the importance of visibility. Declaring one’s homosexuality was no longer a death-sentence; instead, it could be seen as a means of empowerment. The buzz phrase of the decade was “come out”, individuals were encouraged to “celebrate [their] sexuality” (Miller 340). Through successful organizations like the Gay Liberation Front and the Gay Activists Alliance, the homosexual community was able to gain visibility and popularity. This eventually led to the establishment of the National Gay Task Force, which essentially propelled homosexuality into American politics. By the 1970s, society’s view on homosexuality was clearly evolving - at least in the more liberal state of California - when Harvey Milk was elected into public office, ushering in a historic moment in American politics.

With the eruption of AIDS in the 1980s, the dynamic within the gay community began to shift. Homosexuality was likened with promiscuity and “the struggle to stop the spread of AIDS became a struggle over sex” (Miller 411). The reaction towards AIDS within the gay community was avant-garde. Sex was no longer the sole foundation of a homosexual individual’s identity. By reducing the number of sexual partners and abstaining from high-risk sexual escapades, a new sense of community manifested that embraced a more conservative lifestyle (Miller 419). The supporters of gay rights coalesced into an organized, social movement and made immense progress within the time period that Miller characterizes as the gay liberation decades. By the end of the 1980s, the gay community played a significant role in society as a strong and determined force. It was no longer illegal to be gay, but the issues facing the gay community were daunting still. To name a few, the spectra of AIDS, the struggle for legalizing same-sex marriage and associated benefits, continuing to battle prejudice and bigotry still loomed large. While the culmination of the 1980s did not represent the end of the era of gay liberation, it was impressive and significant because the movement collectively achieved so much progress within a relatively short span of time.

Same-sex marriage remains an issue in today’s politics because of America’s reluctance to accept a contemporary view on a traditional institution. The history of marriage in America marks a trail leading from the very conservative to the more liberal. Although the contemporary American observes marriage much differently today than they would have prior to the 1950s and era of gay liberation, the current ban on same sex marriage speaks to the lengths of progress still yet to be made by our society.

By maintaining the ban on same-sex marriage, society promotes and perpetuates gender intolerance. Marriage is used as a tool to maintain the gender binary by clearly delineating the hegemonic and subaltern halves of the spectrum and thus perpetuating gender inequality. This reflects upon the historic concept of coverture, where upon marriage a woman is subsumed under her husband’s authority. Although unfair and seemingly stilted within today’s evolving society, these traditional standards still very much help to define marriage in America. The plaintiff from the Supreme Court case Baehr v Lewin, in which a gay couple argued that same-sex marriage was discrimination under Hawaii’s law, used the tautological argument that “the right of persons of the same sex to marry one another does not exist because marriage, by definition and usage, means a special relationship between a man and a woman” (Eskridge 811). Contemporary American continue to hold the orthodox definition of marriage close to their hearts therefore remaining closed minded to the expansion of marriage rights to those of the same gender.

Although we have continued to advance since the 1990’s, the rate of productivity has slowed, as some of the same challenges faced in the 20th century remain the bone of contention in today’s politics. We often find that intractable issues surrounding gay rights lie at the center of religion and politics and resurface in every political argument. However, the future of those that are legally challenged but more removed from religious debates, such as prejudice in the workplace versus the right to same-sex marriage, looks more promising.
Already, progressive companies such as Google have altered their policies to actively create a gay-friendly workplace. This year, Google began adjusting only their gay and lesbian employees’ paychecks to compensate for this tax since heterosexual employees have the option of marrying to avoid the tax and homosexual employees do not have that choice. As a powerful technology company with immense and growing success, Google’s move to place same-sex couples and heterosexual employees on even par could galvanize some of its other large business competitors to follow suit. Because Google is such an influential company, management decisions they make, such as this one, will be recognized globally and may set as a standard of successful business practices. In a world where information spreads faster than ever before, organizations and businesses will not want to partake of discriminatory behavior if only for reasons to do with their public image – ignoring for a moment that no employer should discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or sexual orientation, or national origin. Hopefully Google’s business strategies will have a ripple effect, stimulating businesses in the US and worldwide to take steps that towards ultimately eliminating discrimination against all homosexual employees.

It is evident that today’s society has been positively influenced by the LGBT movement more so than ever before in the history of the United States. While we still come across tragic incidents and hate crimes targeted at the LGBT community, the country continues to rally around trying to prevent these instances from happening again. The death of Tyler Clementi, a homosexual freshman at Rutgers University who jumped off of the George Washington bridge after being exposed to millions on the internet by his roommate, shocked the nation and galvanized a huge response that proved the movement is still very much alive and making progress. We live in an era of instant news and interconnectedness that lends itself to making progress and moving forward. The era of gay liberation is not yet over, as Miller may have suggested, but will continue until society embraces and accepts all sexual orientations.